The fate of a giant paint can perched atop a Rochester, Minnesota, store hangs in the balance as the city's Heritage Preservation Commission debates its potential landmark status. This quirky, iconic symbol of the city's past has sparked a heated discussion among commission members, with some questioning its significance and others championing its unique place in local history.
The paint can, a recognizable feature of Struve's Paint And Decorating on North Broadway, has been a fixture since the 1950s. Commission member Aleida Koestler views it as a "quirky little historical piece," a sentiment shared by business owner Bruce Struve, who welcomes the potential landmark designation. However, not all members are convinced. Jennifer Shabel and Anthony Poirier argue that the can, while unique, may not hold enough significance to warrant landmark status.
The debate centers on the can's impact on the broader community. In 1996, Struve claimed the can had become a landmark, causing drivers to miss their turns after it blew down during a storm. This anecdote adds a layer of local lore to the can's story. However, Shabel questions whether the can's primary purpose is to advertise the business or to serve a deeper cultural or historical role.
The commission's decision carries weight, as a landmark designation would restrict exterior changes to the building. This raises concerns for the property's future, especially if it changes hands. Bruce Struve is selling the building to Nels and Nicole Pierson, who plan to keep the can in place. Nels Pierson, however, acknowledges the potential devaluation of the property due to landmark designation, a common challenge in historic preservation.
The commission's process, which includes a review and potential appeal, is designed to ensure a thorough examination of the building's significance. While the can and sign could be removed without a permit, a demolition request would trigger a more rigorous process, involving the city council and further study. The current list of potential landmarks, which includes approximately 60 properties, is a daunting task, with Koestler estimating it could take seven years to complete.
The debate over the paint can's landmark status highlights the complexities of preserving local history. While some see it as a beloved symbol, others question its impact. The commission's decision will shape the building's future, influencing its preservation or potential demolition. As the discussion continues, the paint can remains a focal point, symbolizing the ongoing struggle to balance progress and heritage in Rochester.
